Here's your wideo of the week.
A comprehensive analysis of the state of the world today, coming straight from the nation's capital.
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Monday, October 20, 2014
Karma Vista?
By Arnie Zemzow
Microsoft's CEO, Satya Nadella stated Monday that Microsoft
values and compensates female and male labor equally, according to Thomson
Reuters.
Nadella has since been inundated with criticism. After
presenting Microsoft's new cloud technologies, the Microsoft chairman stated
that "women best not ask for a raise at work, relying on good karma."
To an aghast audience, he continued: "It's not worth
asking for higher wages, but it might be worth to understand and trust in the
system that will reward those who do good on their career paths. This, in my
opinion, is one of the additional advantages which women possess - those who do
not request higher wages. This is all because of the connection with good
karma. It will all come back in the future, because someone will understand
that they will be trusted by others, leading to greater added
responsibility."
The head of Microsoft later apologized for his comments and
remarked that he was unclear with his words. Beyond that, he expressed his
belief in the remuneration mechanism of Microsoft: "We, as a whole, are in
great shape. Men and women receive equal pay at Microsoft." At the same
time, Nadella admitted that gender roles is a sphere where Microsoft needs
guidance.
According to popular business and recruiting magazine
Glassdoor, men at Microsoft all receive higher wages than women in analogous
situations. These stats are based on a narrow scope of data, which are
submitted to Glassdoor by Microsoft employees themselves. At Microsoft
headquarters, female employees only comprise about a third of the total staff.
Saturday, October 18, 2014
1001 Arabian Canals
By Alexander Vittorgan
This is the Suez Canal, as it is seen from space. If the Suez Canal is at 10 o'clock on a watch, the new canal will run at 8 o'clock.
The Egyptian government promulgated Sunday, October 18, the
final agreements with six international corporations on accord of the
construction of a Suez Canal alternative,
according to Thompson Reuters. This is the flagship project of president Abdul
Fattah al-Sisi's economic restoration program. The Egyptian economy is
currently in dire straits due to the political instability of late. The
construction of the new canal will be actualized with the enlisted help of UAE,
The Netherlands, Belgium,
and the US.
The Egyptian authorities hope that the new canal will
increase national profits from waterways by 2023 twofold - from 5 billion
dollars to 13.5. In the same vein, there are plans to construct a figurative
rest stop for boats carrying large loads.
The head of the Suez Canal
administration, General Lt. Mohab Meshim informed the public of their intention
to begin work no later than next week, finishing before the fall of next year.
According to Meshim, Egyptian engineers have already begun extensive research
and will continue alongside their international colleagues.
The new yet-unnamed canal will stream parallel to an old
land route, existing for more than 150 years. The Suez Canal is the shortest
passage between the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea.
Critical to commericial and, to an extent, biological life, the Suez Canal is the dominant source of international
capital and investment. That is amplified in its importance in these uneasy
times of weakened economic structures and financial systems since the Tahrir
Revolution of 2011.
The UAE, Saudi Arabia
and Kuwait
sacrificed billions of dollars in aid since Sisi, the former Minister of
Defense, rose to power through his own military coup, overthrowing Muhammed
Morsi, the legitimately-elected president of the Muslim Brotherhood party.
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Wednesday, October 15, 2014
The Bane of the Ukraine
By Nathan Ausubel
For the
past year, Russia and Ukraine have engaged in a bitter struggle. The Ukrainian
government, led by President Petro Poroshenko, wants to gravitate towards the
European Union. Poroshenko realizes that an Association Agreement would bring
much needed trade to the faltering Ukrainian economy, and he is eager to break
free of Russian dependence. Unfortunately for him, Russian President Vladimir
Putin stands in his way.
Putin
has grand plans for Russia. He wants to build Russian influence in the region
by spearheading a new economic union called the Eurasian Economic Union. Russia
desperately wants Ukraine to join this economic union. Putin will use any
methods necessary to accomplish this goal, even stopping the gas pipes in
Ukraine and refusing to pay off Russian debt to the gas company Gazprom.
Ukraine
finds itself in an unwieldy situation. Poroshenko needs to break his dependence
on Russian gas, but he is faced with grim reality: according to the European
Commission, as much as 66% of Ukraine’s natural gas came from Russia in 2006.
If Gazprom fails to reach a gas agreement with the Kiev government, it can stop
the pipes, which has immediate consequences for Ukraine and Eastern European
countries. Gazprom carried through with this threat in January 2006 and January
2009, and Ukraine is certainly not eager to experience a similar situation in
the future.
To make
matters worse, the European Union is reluctant to give a helping hand to
Ukraine. European countries are just as dependant on Russian gas as Ukraine, if
not more so, and they too face the threat of Gazprom stopping the gas.
According to the European Commission, in 2007 Russia was the sole supplier of
natural gas to several E.U. countries, including Estonia, Finland, Latvia, and
Lithuania, according to the European Commission. Russia also supplied 98% of
gas exports to Slovakia and 92% of exports to Bulgaria. European countries are
afraid to take comprehensive steps against Russia when Gazprom can retaliate
with economic penalties.
The
European Union is, of course, responsible for some economic sanctions. It has
frozen the assets of leading Russian officials and businessmen, revoked their
visas, and suspended trade with leading Russian businesses with close ties with
the Kremlin, such as Bank Rossiya. These efforts are, unfortunately,
halfhearted at best because the E.U. is heavily reliant on Russian trade.
With the
European Union concerned with Russian commerce, only the United States can
stand up to Putin. The United States’ sanctions are still selective sanctions,
but American diplomats have acted faster to condemn Russia’s annexation of
Crimea and support for eastern separatists.
Unfortunately,
the United States’ sanctions campaign is almost certainly doomed to fail. In
general, economists estimate that sanctions only have a 25% to 30% chance of
success. The situation in Russia is no exception. Though the sanctions are a
nuisance, Russia can bypass the sanctions by pursuing closer relations with
China and Iran. Russia can also retaliate with its own sanctions. It has
already banned European food products, and it is starting to seize American and
European assets.
Sanctions
are failing to shift public opinion in Russia. From October 2013 to August
2014, Putin’s approval rating actually rose from 64% to 84%. Sanctions are
failing to turn public opinion against the Russian government. The Russian
people, more than ever, are firmly behind Putin’s foreign policy. With the
Russian media leading many Russians to believe that Ukraine is led by a
fascist, human rights-abusing government, Putin is finding little opposition on
the home front.
There is
little more that the United States and European Union can hope to accomplish
from sanctions. They rely too much on Russian trade and have too much to lose
from a military confrontation to risk taking more severe measures against
Russia. Ukraine will find little help from the Western world in coming days.
Russia may have agreed to a cease fire, but Ukraine’s eastern regions are still
under Russian de facto control. As long as Russian separatists control the
eastern regions, and as long as Gazprom controls the supply of gas, Ukraine
will never join the European Union.
Poroshenko’s dreams of a united
Ukraine are over. With little doubt, Putin has scored a victory against the
West.
Sunday, October 12, 2014
The Psychology of Ebola
By Jacob Ausubel
According
to the World Health Organization, the 2014 Ebola epidemic resulted in 3,439
confirmed casualties by October 3rd. The number of Ebola cases in
West Africa could reach 1.4 million by the end of this year. Considering that
the current strain of Ebola is highly virulent and has about a 50% fatality
rate, thousands of people will most likely die in October, November, and
December. Scientists are concerned that the problem could become more severe if
Ebola spreads to other countries or if the virus becomes airborne. The United
Nations estimated that $1 billion is required to contain the epidemic. However,
the international community only invested a fraction of that cost by the
beginning of October.
The
lackluster response to Ebola makes sense from a psychological perspective. In a
study published in the Journal of Neuroscience on
October 9th, 2013, a
team of Max Planck researchers made several observations about human empathy.
According to the paper, people who are in an “agreeable and comfortable
situation” have difficulty empathizing with an individual’s suffering. This
research suggests that westerners, unacquainted with Ebola prior to 2014 and
accustomed to receiving high-quality health service, do not find the problem in
West Africa relatable.
Another explanation for the response is
that people spend more time focusing on positive outcomes than negative
outcomes. Research conducted by neuroscientist Elizabeth Phelps suggests
that the “[direction] of thoughts of the future toward the positive” is due to the interaction between the frontal cortex, a part of the brain, with subcortical regions deep inside of the brain. Phelps’ research suggests that members of the public are not spending enough time thinking about the spread of the Ebola virus across the globe. Consequently, an inadequate amount of money is being spent to mitigate the effects of the virus. In fact, a CNN survey released in mid-September 2014 indicates that only 27% of Americans are worried about getting Ebola.
that the “[direction] of thoughts of the future toward the positive” is due to the interaction between the frontal cortex, a part of the brain, with subcortical regions deep inside of the brain. Phelps’ research suggests that members of the public are not spending enough time thinking about the spread of the Ebola virus across the globe. Consequently, an inadequate amount of money is being spent to mitigate the effects of the virus. In fact, a CNN survey released in mid-September 2014 indicates that only 27% of Americans are worried about getting Ebola.
Americans should be far more concerned
about Ebola than they are right now. The spread of the virus poses a risk not
only to people’s lives but also to the global economy as well. The situation is
not necessarily helpless. People are capable of empathizing with others, as the
research of the Max Planck scientists suggests. The United States should inform
citizens about the dangers of the virus so that Americans empathize more with
the suffering of West Africans.
CDC Finds Idibola More Harmful Than Ebola
09H00M----ATLANTA, GA, USA
The head of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) announced
Monday that researchers have found “a new threat to public health of the United States
and the world.” Answering questions about what these sinister words meant, Dr.
Thomas Frieden remarked that “the disease is a derivative of the Ebola
pandemic. We’re concerned about this development. Our team notes that these
offspring appear during any crisis.” Pressured further by disgruntled CBS host
Bob Schieffer, Frieden flatly announced, “It’s called Idibola. Given the
stupidity of the population, we’ve noticed a widespread misinformation about
Ebola. If I go any further into it, people are going to get scared of Idibola,
too.” Frieden, seen obviously upset by the encounter, got up, put on his stethoscope,
picked up his medical bag, and headed out to a waiting ambulance outside the
studio. “Yes, it’s my car. Screw off,” he sneered.
Ebola has been spreading at rapid rates around the United States. 6,000
Africans have been confirmed with Ebola, while already four Americans have been
diagnosed with Ebola. It has been reflected on the public. Long lines at John F. Kennedy International
Airport in New York have instated screenings for Ebola
before departure. Multiple airports around the world have seen delays,
interruptions, or even closures, such as at Newark International
Airport. According to Mayo
Clinic medical expert Mark Affenberg, these are all dangerous signs.
“These are symptoms consistent with Idibola. We have not
seen this sort of case of pandemonium from a disease since Swine Flu. This
country is especially predisposed to such medical afflictions. The United States is not nearly as well-equipped for
an educated response to world threats to public health as Europe,
such as we have seen with Ebola. The numbers are everywhere: we are simply less
apt to being informed and aware of the truths about medical issues in the
world,” asserted Dr. Affenberg
FFSOM has found that the numbers agree with the sentiment.
41.5% of Americans get vaccinated from influenza each year, compared to around
85% of Canadians, according to the United Nations report on the well-being of
the child.
“The issue is, Ebola is only transmitted through liquidity associations
– fecal matter, sweat, saliva – that’s about it. The people who get up in arms
about flying next to someone who talked to someone who looked at someone who
emailed someone with signs of Ebola are the primary examples of Idibola
carriers. They are real and they are frightening,” continued Affenberg.
The story is rather different in DeRidder, Louisiana, where the Church of the Holy
Father has been preaching dangerous faux-facts about Ebola. According to testimonies, Father Thomas imparts that, "I have told you, my docile ones, that all things internet are harmful. Now we have E-bola! First e-mail, now e-bola. What's next? e-communism? e-gays? e-lesbians?" All of the church
members have been quarantined for Idibola. We were granted special access to
the CDC’s laboratory to speak to them. One of the congregation members agreed
to talk to FFSOM on condition of anonymity.
“We don’t need no homiesexuals [sic.] or Nazis or Commies
bringing us Ehbawla [sic.]. One breath and you’re out. I got my rifles ready,
my garanades [sic.]. Uncle Tommy thinks the Islamo-muslims [sic.] bringing it
to Louisiana.
We pray to Lord Jesus to stop the onslaught of Ebola, but we don’t think Jesus wanna
help us poor souls in DeRidder.”
DISCLAIMER: This article is satirical in nature. It is not intended to be factual or serious. All characters, places, or situations appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, places, or situations is purely coincidental.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)